14.1.09

January 11 2009 - Report From Battered Mother's Custody Conference

·

 

Children Against Court Appointed Child Abuse - CA3

January 11 2009 - Report From Battered Mother's Custody Conference

THIS IS REALLY HARD TO BELIEVE
By Barry Nolan
January 11 2009


This is really hard to believe. I am sitting in a room filled with women who were beaten, and violated in terrible ways. The room is not in Bosnia, or some far flung third-world hell-hole. I am in a function room in a hotel in Albany at the Battered Mothers Custody Conference.


Many of the women around me are sobbing now, as a child tells her story. “My father beat me” she begins. Well, she is not a child now actually, but she is a child to me. She is a poised, attractive young woman named Jennifer Collins who is a survivor of child abuse and of a Child and Family Court System that betrayed her and her brother, just as it betrays children across this country every day when it orders children to live full time with an abusive parent.


I know you do not believe me. And that makes me realize that this is the experience that these women who surround me have all had. No one believes them. No one believes this can happen. But it does. Sometimes this happens despite voluminous evidence, eyewitnesses and medical records that the child has been beaten, even raped and sodomized by a parent seeking custody. Sometimes the courts do this even if the parent seeking custody has been convicted of, or admitted to domestic violence or sexual assault. I know you don’t believe me. But you would believe Jennifer if you were here.


It is a strange world in Child and Family court. For instance, even as much energy in the wider world goes into efforts to make certain that sex offenders have no access to children, that they can’t live near a school and walk near a playground, in this odd little corner of our judicial system, courts routinely order children to “reunite” with a sexual predator parent who hurt them. All in the name of “family re-unification”.


I know this sounds impossible. It is against all common sense. This is America after all. But come sit here with me, and listen to this woman/child tell her story. She has “aged out” of the system and is no longer under the thumb of a court that tells her she must be silent. There is a whole group of courageous kids like Jennifer who are old enough now to tell their story to you, face to face. Jennifer’s story is a pip. And it is pretty typical.


Jennifer tells us about her mother Holly and her dad. He was a batterer who beat Holly. And he beat the children. Jennifer moves her story along quickly to the day when her older brother, then about 4, tried to intervene as dad was beating mom. Dad threw the son against the wall and fractured his skull. There is much more. But I will move the story along quickly to what happens when Holly finally decided to leave this man who beat her and the children. She fled that terrible house, only to find herself in house of mirrors. The Child and Family Court system.


It is almost as if none of the people who run the Child and Family Court system ever read about or learned a single thing from sad saga of the Catholic Church’s sexual abuse scandal. It’s like they never heard about how victims of physical or sexual abuse are often silenced by their own sense of shame. How their terrible stories can sometimes finally come pouring out in torrents. It may be years later, but it is no less true. This is not theory. This is fact. We have all watched these sad dramas on the 6 O’clock news.


But, uniquely in Child and Family Court, if allegations of physical or sexual abuse are raised during a divorce where custody is an issue, the allegations are used, not against the perpetrator, but against the victim. There is this invented thing, a bit of junk science called “Parental Alienation Syndrome”. It basically says that any time a woman raises the issue of physical or sexual abuse, of herself or the children in the midst of a custody dispute, she is just trying to make the man look bad and make the children hate him. She must be lying.


Look, I am not a fool. I know people lie. I know some women lie. I know people say awful things about each other in divorces. I have watched Jerry Springer just like you. But I have also watched “To Catch a Predator” and I know “respectable” people can do horrible things. So, do a thought experiment here. Pretend you are a woman who had finally left an abusive relationship, taking your children with you. If your controlling soon-to-be ex-husband sought to get full custody of the children as one last slap at you, what would you say? OK? Sure, that sounds fair? Fat chance.


The thing a real court would do when this happened is to consider all the evidence, and talk to all the witnesses. Witnesses like the children. They were after all, there when “it” happened. This is what a court would do if a stranger were accused of beating them. Or raping them. But this is not what the Child and Family Court system does.


Jennifer, the survivor, tells us of the day the representative of the court came to take her away from her mother and take her to live at her dad’s. How she clung desperately to her mother’s leg, until they pried her fingers loose, lifted her up, carried her away, and compelled her to live with the man who would beat her. Jennifer tells us how her mother, desperate beyond all measure, kidnapped the children, spirited them away to the Netherlands, where they became the first Americans to be granted asylum. How she lived in a refugee camp, with refugees from Somalia and Sierra Leone, people who had to learn how to use toilets and forks. How this was better than “home”. This was a step up. She was with her mom.


Jennifer lived in exile for 14 years. She finally “aged out”. The court has no jurisdiction now. And so Jennifer had the freedom to come home, to America, to this room where I sit, surrounded by women who are now weeping with joy and cheering for Jennifer’s mom for being so brave and for Jennifer for telling her story to this room full of people who know her story is true. Because the same thing happened to them. So they believe her.
I believe her, too.

Posted by childrenunderground at 9:45 AM 0 comments

13.1.09

“Wear the colors BLACK and BLUE so that the children don’t have to.” www.CA3CACACA.blogspot.com (I love you mom, I love you Rikki, “Don’t Give up”)

·


Dear mom and Rikki, (I miss you both terribly)

Upon my return from the sixth annual www.BatteredMothersCustodyConference.org (yes I made it thx mom). I met the most wonderful now grown children The Courageous kids- and in particular Jennifer Collins adult child survivor and a force to be reckoned with as we will carry her voice her message and the voices of all those who remain silent.

M. Jill Dykes GAL – (Topeka Kansas Court Appointed Child Abuser) I have a t-shirt for you from no more ca- ca- in case you don't know what that means- no more shit- put simply.

These kids have your number- they survived what you have done to them and they are speaking out about the abuse you put them through.. the years long and hard the suffering the long term medical and psychological damage that has lined your pockets for years- their blood.

www.CA3CACACA.blogspot.com

“Wear the colors BLACK and BLUE so

that the children don’t have to.”

www.CA3CACACA.blogspot.com

My heart died- listening to the courageous kids- it died and like a phoenix was reborn. I can not change the past but I do control this day. And for this day I tip my hat my heart my love for all the children my daughter and all the mothers- my mother. ( thx mom- even in death your voice and presence is strong-GER)

GAL’s MHP’s your glory and profit on our children's blood is limited. (and you know it) For each voice you silent 3 more voices will take their place.

Thank you Jennifer for your voice- for your strength for your peers- to the adult children who spoke out this conference- your pain your determination has opened many flood gates…

..and renewed hope for so many…mothers, children, advocates and other professionals….

Below are some of the videos to the conference, I have yet to name them they are however dated and numbered. This channel will stay devoted exclusively to the videos of the conference.

we are one- silent no more- the storms have begun.

When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won.

There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible,

but in the end, they always fall––think of it--always. --Mahatma Gandhi

Video and Speakers from the Sixth Annual

Battered Mothers Custody Conference

January 9th-12th, 2009

http://bmcc6.blip.tv/

Warmest regards,

Claudine Dombrowski

www.AngelFury.org

www.KS-FCRC.com

www.JusticeForMothers.com

www.KansansForJudicialAccountability.com

Another Outrageous judgment by the Family Court where they ignored the warning signs, the consequence:Murder-suicide was act of revenge, court hears

·


 

 

Another Outrageous judgment by the Family Court where they ignored the warning signs, the consequence:Murder-suicide was act of revenge, court hears

Another Outrageous judgement by the Family Court where they ignored the warning signs, the consequences are fatal.

60% males killed in retalitory killings which were more likely to result in multiple homicides where a parent was also murdered mostly by a non-custodial parent. (2)
Most child-killers in NSW were men, with 100 responsible or jointly responsible for 106 deaths, of the 37 infants killed, 21 were killed by men.(1)
Murder-suicide was act of revenge, court hears

By Larissa CummingsJanuary 13, 2009 12:00am
Article from the Daily Telegraph
A SYDNEY father murdered his teenage daughter before killing himself as an act of revenge to punish his wife for divorcing him, a court has heard.
In an inquest into the tragic murder/suicide, Deputy State Coroner Malcolm MacPherson yesterday found the 53-year-old man, who cannot be identified, strangled or suffocated his 13-year-old daughter in the family's Pennant Hills home before hanging himself.
The court heard divorce proceedings instigated by the man's wife were due to be finalised in the Family Court just five days after his "vindictive" act of revenge in January last year.Although the couple, from Iran, lived under the same roof with their two sons, aged 26 and 24, and daughter, they had not spoken to each other for several years.
The court heard the daughter was the only member of the household to communicate with her father and she served as a go-between for her parents.Officer-in-charge of the investigation Detective Senior Constable Martin Wilson told the inquest the man's wife considered her husband "an abusive and selfish man" who gambled and drank away his wages.The court heard the girl's body was discovered by her mother and eldest brother when they arrived home on January 3, 2008. She was lying on the loungeroom floor and appeared to have suffered facial injuries.Police found blood in the kitchen sink and a blood-soaked piece of paper towel, plastic wrap and a plastic clip-lock bag in the bin.In the father's bedroom, bloodstains were found at the foot of his bed and a letter to his wife was on a computer.
It read: "If you look, you may not believe, but that doesn't change anything . . . I asked you to be my wife after seven years of not being, or choose divorce. You choose (sic) divorce, which means Death Is Very Often Reflecting Catastrophic Events."The man also left a letter for his younger son, detailing sums of money in his bank accounts and leaving him his car. The man's body was found hanging from a rope tied to a roof beam in the laundry.Sen-Constable Wilson said he believed the father assaulted the girl before strangling her or suffocating her with the plastic bag."(The man), for reasons known only to himself, has decided to punish his wife and sons," he said."In order to achieve this, he has killed his daughter . . . leaving her body at the foot of his bed (which may be symbolic to him) where she would be found by her mother and brother."
In what appears to be one final vindictive act, he has written letters . . . to make the recipients believe they were either responsible or could have done something to prevent the deaths."

Stop the Killings and Write to:

enquiries@familylawcourts.gov.au

complaints@ag.gov.au

flc@ag.gov.au

Suggested letter:

Dear Sir/Madem,

I am writing with concern about the continued negligence practiced toward women and children in the family court that prioritises fathers rights above safety and well being. Recent statistics on child homicide and the death of this thirteen year old girl who is among many victims of a court system that clearly ignores and undermines the value of childrens lives with very little accountability.

In many cases there are warning signs that your courts fail to ignore and trivialise at the detriment of children. I am aware that the 121 secrecy law also prevents child victims from speaking out against these atrocities and may endure continued and relentless exposure to abuse due to the over concern for false allegations that have been published in many articles in very low percentages as 2%. Many international studies reflect this, yet every parent and child who raises it are often ignored and systematically abused. It is an outrage that such barbaric practices continue under the lie of, "best interest of the child".

Sincerely,

(Your Name)

0 comments ShareThis

9.1.09

Attorney Barry L. Goldstein of Stop Family Violence, The Sidran Institute, Sanctioned for web site post and on behalf of Battered Women and Court Abused Children

·

Glenn Sacks and Men's Daily News boasted links to this and now the fatherhood fanatics are attacking.

This is BS-  a man can rape beat even kill women and children and be given kudos and silver awards ($$profit$$ ya know) but god forbid  we expose the corruption.. and oppression- and is true of all societal change Gandhi says it best IMO..

1st they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they FIGHT you-(but always-in the end) you win.

be outraged- there will be many more-who ‘dare’ to tilt the power.

 

Hang in there Barry you are not alone- ‘we are many and we are –ONE.

-Claudine

live from the www.BatteredMothersCustodyConference.org

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2009/01/the-new-york-ap.html

Attorney Sanctioned For Web Site Post

The New York Appellate Division for the Second Judicial Department imposed a five year suspension of an attorney found to have committed a laundry list of ethics violations in two matters. One involved misuse of funds entrusted to the attorney in connection with his representation of a not-for-profit tenants housing resource center; the other involved representations to and about a court in a domestic relations case where custody had been transferred from his client to her ex-husband:

The respondent represented Yevgenia Shockome, the mother in the child custody matter, and in a divorce action in the Supreme Court. The respondent wrote an article entitled, "A Call for Genia's Law by Barry L. Goldstein, Stop Family Violence," which was posted on a web site for the Battered Mothers' Custody Conference as part of a campaign to free the respondent's client, who had been imprisoned after being held in contempt by Judge Amodeo. One or more of the following excerpts from that article were dishonest, false, or misleading:

i. "Without an evidentiary hearing or any written explanation, Judge Amodeo took the children from the mother who has raised them and sent them to the abuser."

ii. "Judge Amodeo got around this in his decision by constructing a bizarre conclusion that he, the Judge, had caused the mother's PTSD."

iii. "At one point it was discovered that the court had erased two of the transcripts[,] further delaying the appeal."

iv. "The decision demanded that the mother stop therapy with her present therapist and instead use someone selected by the court."

v. "I had to make a motion to withdraw from the case in front of Judge Amodeo for medical reasons... The law requires that when a party loses an attorney for medical reasons, that she is entitled to at least a 30-day stay to obtain another attorney. Instead, Amodeo continued to make her come to court unrepresented, to face more abuse. After the 30 days has passed (with no stay) he decided that she had enough time to find an attorney."

vi. "The police were called and they found that the supervisor had attacked the mother and child."

viii. "Judge Amodeo called numerous conferences to attack and berate the mother for interfering with the phone calls and the father's relationship with the children."

The court rejected the following contentions:

In determining the appropriate measure of discipline to impose, the respondent asks the Court to consider, with respect to the escrow violations, that they were "technical errors," that "he was just an honest attorney attempting to help others," and that he has since corrected his ways. The respondent's witnesses testified to his reputation for cooperation, honesty, and sincerity.

While the respondent contends, with regard to the charges relating to the Shockome matter, that these disciplinary proceedings were brought by the Grievance Committee in retaliation and as a penalty for his criticism of Judge Amodeo and the courts, we find no basis for such a contention. To the contrary, we find the respondent's utter failure to appreciate the fact that his conduct exceeded the bounds of propriety as a courtroom advocate, his complete lack of remorse, and the pervasive nature of his deceptive conduct to be aggravating factors. Irrespective of the respondent's sincerity in his beliefs, his overzealous behavior which took the form of disparaging remarks on the court, false accusations about Judge Amodeo disseminated in a public forum as part of a campaign to pressure the court into changing its rulings, and noncompliance with multiple court orders, truly constituted conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.

The attorney had no record of prior discipline.(Mike Frisch)

8.1.09

National TV Show Questions the Validity of the PAS Strategy Jennifer Collins, Leadership Council,

·

National TV Show Questions the Validity of the PAS Strategy
Thursday, September 25th, 2008 at 11:01 am

 

National TV Show Questions the Validity of the PAS Strategy
Thursday, September 25th, 2008 at 11:01 am


Dr. Joy Silberg Vice President of the Leadership Council and Jennifer Collins (Age 23), child victim of the PAS legal strategy, appeared on the nationally syndicated Morning Show with Mike and Juliet on September 25, 2008.


On the show, Dr. Silberg and Jennifer questioned the validity of the PAS legal strategy, which has been used by child molesters, batterers, and child abusers to gain custody of their children in family courts.
Other guests on the show included: Geraldo Rivera & Glenn Sacks.
This show aired on FOX: 9/25/2008
View the segment here. http://www.mandjshow.com/videos/parental-alienation-syndrome/

Battered Mother PROTECTS her children-where the courts failed again.

·

Holly Ann Collins sought asylum for her children and herself in the Netherlands to escape abuse; her case has recently received national attention. Holly's daughter Jennifer, now 23, is unabashedly demanding answers from America's family courts. Jennifer has posted extensive information, court documents, and videos online at ChildrenUnderground http://www.youtube.com/user/childrenunderground, and will be presenting her family's story at the 2009 conference. http://batteredmotherscustodyconference.org./

7.1.09

Minnesota Mom-Same Judge, Same MHP, Same PAS Scam

·

http://batteredmomslosecustody.wordpress.com/2009/01/06/311/

 

January 6, 2009 — batteredmomslosecustody | Edit

Comment from Minnesota Mom who had the same Judge and MHP as Holly Collins, battered mom and kids who received asylum for human rights violations in the Netherlands.

Amazing how so frequently, the same people are involved in case after case using the same scam, same rhetoric, and same fraud to advocate for abusers.

Tiffani Says:

I am so happy to have found this site. I had the same Judge Porter, Susan DeVries, GAL was Jim Campbell who followed their lead and was hand picked by Judge. Doneldon Dennis was supervisor over Family Court Services, while running the AFCC side by side. Susan DeVries is also a member. Kay Kraus is partner in crime as well and they formed some private business.

I would like to add to the Hall of Shame we need GAL’s and Evaluators on there.

Minnesota Mom - your names have been added.

Thanks for the contribution.

__._,_.___